Breastfeeding With Implants

With the growing number of breast augmentation procedures each year, more and more women are seeking information about breastfeeding with implants. Internet searches can be confusing. On one website various plastic surgeons assert that in most cases breastfeeding with implants offers no risk at all to a mother’s milk supply. Other sites mention potential problems of insufficient milk depending on the procedure used. Breastfeeding authors Wambach and Spencer1 review several studies to conclude that historically only a third of mothers with implants were successful with breastfeeding but more recent studies show lower complication rates.

This article looks at whether breastfeeding with implants is possible, how breast implants affect milk supply and whether breastfeeding with implants is safe for the breastfed baby.

What are implants?

Breast implants are soft man-made silicone structures that are inserted under the skin to alter and enlarge breasts.

some now holding two breast implants one in each hand
Most breast implants comprise a silicone shell filled with silicone gel (made from silicon) and some are filled with saline (salt water)

Can you breastfeed with implants?

Yes, it is possible to breastfeed with implants but breast implants may affect a mother’s capacity to produce a full milk supply. Whether a mother will have a full or only a partial milk supply depends on;

  • the type of surgery involved and the amount of damage to nerves or breast tissue
  • whether there is any scarring in the milk ducts, and
  • how much functional milk making (glandular) tissue is present both before and after the procedure.

As with every breastfeeding experience, success also depends on having the correct information about good latch, positioning and breastfeeding management. Knowing how to make more breast milk and wanting to succeed are also important.

all women who have had augmentation surgery face the possibility of compromising maximum milk volume not only from the site of the incision but also from nerve disruption and pressure from the implant on breast structures

How do breast implants affect breastfeeding?

Breast implants can reduce a mother’s milk supply. The extent of damage depends on;

#1 Location of the incision

The position of the cut (incision) and the surgical technique used to insert an implant affect how much damage there is to nerves, milk glands, ducts or the blood supply in the breast. For example, an incision around the edge of the areola (the darker skin around the nipple) is more likely to damage the nerve that is critical to nipple sensitivity and the let-down reflex (release of breast milk).

  • Nerves. The fourth intercostal nerve is the main nerve providing sensation to the nipple and areola2. Stimulation of this nerve also triggers the release of the breastfeeding hormones oxytocin (for milk release or “let-down”) and prolactin (for milk production) from the brain3. Any damage to this critical nerve could affect the reflex needed for making and releasing breast milk.
  • Milk glands and ducts. Breast milk is made inside the breast by the milk making (glandular) tissue. Fine ducts (tubes) carry the breast milk to the nipple. Anything that cuts across or damages the ducts or glandular tissue can interrupt the exit route for milk via the nipple or the capacity of the breast to make a full milk supply. There is a greater likelihood of damaged tissues where a breast is being remodelled (a breast lift) alongside augmentation.
  • Blood supply. Any major damage to the blood supply to the breast or nipple could result in local tissue necrosis (death of the tissue).

Surgical techniques

There are a number of different surgical techniques to insert a breast implant. Five commonly described incision sites are under the breast, in the armpit, around the nipple, via the tummy button and through the abdomen. Incisions under the breast or in the armpit are thought to have less impact on milk production. Each of the techniques is briefly explained below:

  • Under the breast (inframammary technique) is currently the most popular technique for breast enlargement. A cut is made under the breast, and the implant is placed under the breast tissue or muscle. The scar may not be visible when the incision is in the inframammary fold or crease (where the breast meets the chest wall). This technique leaves the glandular tissue and nerves intact so has less impact on milk production.
  • In the armpit (axillary enlargement or transaxillary technique). This technique involves inserting the implant under the muscle via an incision under the arm near the arm pit. Saline implants tend to be favoured under the muscle (Wambach and Spencer, 2020). Scarring is generally invisible and, as above, the technique leaves the glandular tissue and nerves intact.
  • Around the nipple (periareolar incision technique) involves cutting around the nipple and areola sufficiently deeply to insert the implant packet. Cutting around the areolar minimises scarring but these incisions are associated with reduced nipple stimulation and difficulties breastfeeding4. One study showed that women with this type of procedure were nearly five times more likely to have problems with breastfeeding due to damage to ducts, glandular tissue and nerves5.
  • Through the tummy button (transumbilical or periumbilical) involves involves inserting the implant via an incision in the tummy button and bringing it into place in the breast above the muscle. This technique is infrequently used and is for saline implants only (Wambach and Spencer, 2020). Positioning the implant may cause some damage to the breast tissue en route despite there not being any incisions to the breast tissue and nerves.
  • Through the abdomen (transabdominal insertion) may be used for smaller implants (Wambach and Spencer, 2020) or for patients requiring a tummy tuck at the same time as a breast implant.6
An incision around the nipple and areola is more likely to damage the nerve that triggers the the let-down reflex

#2 Position and size of the implant

In addition to the surgical technique (#1) the size and position of the implant can affect the pressure within the breast. The breast is composed of glandular (milk making) tissue above a layer of muscle. If the implant packet is placed between the glandular tissue and the muscle layer, it may exert more pressure on the ducts and glands which could interfere with milk flow and reduce milk production (similar to an engorged breast). Conversely, when the implant is placed beneath the muscle layer this may have less impact on milk production7. However I have not yet found any reliable research studies discussing this assertion. Wambach and Spencer, 2020 simply state that the implant under the muscle allows better mammography visualisation.

Larger implants

  • One study found that larger implants were associated with less nipple sensitivity after surgery8
  • The larger the implant the more pressure could be exerted on the milk making tissue
  • Particularly large breasts can sometimes bring their own challenges to finding comfortable positions for breastfeeding see Breastfeeding With Large Breasts for more reading.
A diagram showing the position of a breast implant both above and below the muscle layer
Diagram shows a cross section of the breast (left) with the implant above the muscle layer (centre) and below the muscle (right)

#3 Scar tissue and engorgement

Scar tissue as a result of the surgery may cause firmness in the breast, distortion and pain and can extend into milk ducts and affect the milk supply 9. If milk can’t drain freely from the breast, women with breast implants may be more prone to excessive engorgement and mastitis 10.

#4 Changes to sensitivity

Following breast implant surgery some mothers find their breasts are very painful and incredibly sensitive even to normal touch making breastfeeding extremely difficult. Mothers who have had breast and nipple surgery can be more prone to experiencing nipple vasospasm (a painful, burning sensation in the nipple).11 Some mothers may have a loss of feeling or numbness in the nipple due to damaged nerves. This can affect the reflex needed for milk production and make it difficult to know when a baby’s attachment at the breast (latch) feels comfortable. If sensitivity to the nipple has been lost it still may be possible to use other triggers to initiate the let-down reflex—see Let-Down Reflex: Too Slow? by Kelly Bonyata.

#5 Functional breast tissue

Where cosmetic or reconstructive surgery to enlarge a breast is due to abnormal breast development, there may be an underlying absence of functional breast tissue. In such a situation breastfeeding difficulties could be related to this rather than the breast implant surgery directly, but problems are likely to be compounded by implants12. Diana West discusses the breast types that are risk factors for low milk production:

Although small breast size alone is not a risk factor for low milk production, certain breast types are known to be risk factors for insufficient glandular tissue. These types include tubular-shaped breasts, widely spaced breasts (greater than 1.5 inches of flat space between them), undeveloped breasts, and asymmetrical breasts. When little glandular tissue exists to begin with, milk production capability is significantly reduced even before the surgical procedures occur.

#6 Complications

Breast implants are not lifetime devices, and often require corrective procedures13. Complications and follow up surgery for repair or revision can cause further damage to breast tissue which can affect breastfeeding success14. Complications can include long-term pain, hardening of the breast around the implant (capsular contracture), surgical removal of scar tissue, change of implant type, location or size, repeat breast uplift procedure, pressure within the breast and infection (Michalopous, 2007; Spear et al, 2003)

Random milk production

Occasionally a mother with breast implants may have milk production unrelated to breastfeeding (galactorrhea) or a milk filled cyst (galactocele)15. This is usually linked to postoperative congestion around the implant which often requires removal of the implants16. Wambach and Spencer note that spontaneous milk production, milk cysts, and extreme engorgement can follow breast surgery without a pregnancy; sometimes associated with birth control hormones17.

Can damaged glands, ducts and nerves heal?

Yes, there is potential for some glands and ducts to reconnect after surgery (recanalisation) and some damaged nerves may repair themselves over time (reinnervation). How much feeling a mother has in her breasts and nipples gives a guide to whether the nerves are intact. 18

Glandular tissue itself also continues to develop under the influence of pregnancy and breastfeeding hormones19 and areas of the breast that are functioning normally may help compensate for any damaged areas. While a mother might only produce a partial milk supply for her first baby after implant surgery, subsequent babies may enjoy an improved supply. Diana West IBCLC states that the milk supply is usually better if five years have passed since the surgery (West, 2011).


Maximising milk supply

If you are breastfeeding with implants it is helpful to stay in close contact with an IBCLC lactation consultant to maximise your milk supply. You can also read our articles on getting breastfeeding off to a good startincreasing milk supply and the value of galactagogues (herbs, foods or medications that may promote milk production).

Many mothers who have had breast augmentation or reduction surgery also increase their milk supplies with herbal and prescription galactagogues (milk-inducing substances). The herb goat’s rue in particular seems to be helpful for mothers who have had breast surgery, but there are many others that can be effective as well.

Breastfeeding with implants—safety issues

What are implants made of?

Most breast implants comprise a silicone shell filled with silicone gel (made from silicon) and some are filled with saline (salt water). Silicone is a synthetic substance, a mixture of compounds made from silicon (a naturally occurring element found in sand). In manufacturing, silicone is generally described as having low toxicity and has various uses in industry (insulation sealants), in the medical field (tubing), and in the home (kitchenware, bottle teats, toys). Within the human breast itself however, silicone has been associated with many health issues 20.

Risks and complications of breast implants

The general safety of breast implants is beyond the scope of this article, for further information see:

Safety risks and complications

Breast implants and cancer

Breast implant illness

  • Healing Breast Implant Illness and Breast Implant Illness—are support groups offering support and information to those experiencing symptoms of breast implant illness which includes autoimmune disease, cancer and more.
  • New research provides a possible mechanism for breast implant illness from gel-filled silicone implants21
  • Silicone Breast Implants and Injections discusses how silicone devices within the body can cause local inflammation and autoimmune type symptoms and questions whether silicone could be introduced to the foetus via the placenta.

There is concern that breast implants can cause lactation difficulties, reproductive problems and adverse medical conditions 2223.

Is breastfeeding with implants safe?

The safety of breastfeeding with implants is unclear:

  • Conflicting information. The UK’s NHS states a baby will not be harmed by breastfeeding with implants24 and in the USA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that there is insufficient evidence to say breast implants can harm a breastfed baby25. Conversely one support group has collected studies, mostly from 1990s, that indicated possible harm for some children born or breastfed by mothers with implants26. Thomas Hale, breastfeeding and medications expert, says silicone is inert (chemically inactive) and unlikely to be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract by a breastfed baby although he cautions good studies are lacking27.
  • Gaps in knowledge. Research has found that when silicone devices are inside the body they have the potential to trigger inflammation and health issues 28293031. How this could affect a foetus or breastfed infant is not clear and more long-term studies are needed.
  • Future research. Song et al plan to do a systematic review and meta-analysis on the health of babies born to mothers with breast implants 32.

Can breast implants leak into breast milk?

The Food and Drug Administration of the United States say it is not known whether small amounts of silicone from breast implants can enter breast milk:

At this time, it is not known if a small amount of silicone may pass through from the breast implant silicone shell into breast milk during breastfeeding. Although there are currently no established methods for accurately detecting silicone levels in breast milk, a study measuring silicon (one component in silicone) levels did not indicate higher levels in breast milk from women with silicone gel-filled implants when compared to women without implants.

The “study” often cited by Semple et al 33 is from over 20 years ago and was published in a plastic and reconstructive surgery journal (so potentially biased). It found similar levels of silicon in breast milk and blood from mothers with implants compared with mothers without implants. They also found ten times more silicon in cows’ milk and significantly higher levels in formula. However, silicon is not the same as silicone—it is an ingredient in silicone and the study didn’t look at the other potential toxic contaminants that are in implants. A study by Lykissa and Maharaj 34 found higher levels of platinum in mothers’ milk in mothers with implants than in the general population.

Hyaluronic acid injections

Core Curriculum for Lactation Consultant Practice, 2013 says that hyaluronic acid injections (Macrolane) directly into breast tissue, have been used to increase breast size since 2008. Regarding their safety with respect to breastfeeding they state:

Hyaluronic acid injections are not a contraindication to breastfeeding. The oral bioavailability of hyaluronic acid is nil and therefore even if it were to transfer into milk, it would not be readily absorbed by the baby’s GI tract (Hale, 2010;, March 2011)


Breast implants have the potential to compress milk ducts and affect milk flow which can reduce a milk supply. The surgical technique used during the procedure and how much functional glandular tissue was present prior to the surgery will also dictate exactly how milk supply is affected. With these potential difficulties in mind, a mother breastfeeding with implants should take extra care to get breastfeeding off to a good start so she can maximise her milk supply. An IBCLC lactation consultant is a helpful partner to have especially if there are any early signs that baby is not getting enough milk or not gaining weight normally. It is not known whether silicone from the breast implant packet can enter breast milk. Until research proves otherwise, babies are still thought to benefit from any amount of human milk that can be provided. Currently there is no clear evidence that breastfeeding with implants could harm the baby directly other than by reducing milk available but more long-term studies are needed.

Given the risks of complications, women would be wise to delay implants until after they have their children and are no longer breastfeeding.